Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a score of 85.2, which is much better than the Moto G8 Power Lite's general score of 74.3. Even though the Samsung Galaxy F41 and Moto G8 Power Lite were released only 6 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy F41 is a little bit lighter and just a little thinner. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy F41 has the previous 11 version and Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy F41 features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy F41 features a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per screen inch and a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Galaxy F41 has a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy F41 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with better battery performance than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a 20% more battery size.
Galaxy F41 captures a lot better pictures and videos than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better low light photos and video, a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.