Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-20 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than Moto G8 Power Lite, with a global score of 97.6 against 74.3. Both devices we compare here come with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (Operating System). Even though the Samsung Galaxy Fold and Moto G8 Power Lite were released only 7 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Fold's body is notably heavier but also thinner.
Galaxy Fold has a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a much better resolution of 1536 x 2152, a bit bigger display and a higher display pixels density.
Galaxy Fold captures much clearer photos and videos than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a much worse 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way better video quality and a much larger camera aperture. Galaxy Fold counts with a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Moto G8 Power Lite counts with a little better battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G8 Power Lite, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G8 Power Lite. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Moto G8 Power Lite, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.