Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-20 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M40 has an overall score of 85, which is much better than the Moto G8 Power Lite's score of 74.3. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy M40 has the previous 10 version while Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy M40 body is thinner and somewhat lighter than Moto G8 Power Lite, despite of the fact that it was released only 10 months before.
Galaxy M40 features a brighter display than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much greater pixels density and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Samsung Galaxy M40 features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M40, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy M40 has a much better camera than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a back camera with way more mega pixels, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Moto G8 Power Lite counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy M40, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.