Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, with a general score of 90.8 against 74.3. Galaxy Note 20 is a a little lighter and a little bit thinner device than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, although both of them were released only a few months apart. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a sharper display than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a higher pixel density and a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 features a superior camera than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a camera in the back with much less mega pixels, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light captures and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Moto G8 Power Lite has slightly more storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 256 GB. Moto G8 Power Lite counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16% more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G8 Power Lite, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G8 Power Lite. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Moto G8 Power Lite, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.