Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, having a 98.9 score against 74.3. These phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite were released only 4 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is just a little heavier but somewhat thinner.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better display than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a way better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a much higher display pixel density and a bit larger display.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a bigger aperture, a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution back camera and a lot higher video definition. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than Moto G8 Power Lite, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.