Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the Moto G8 Power Lite's 74.3 general score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version and Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy Note 3 body is lighter and just a little thinner than Moto G8 Power Lite, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
Galaxy Note 3 features an incredibly better display than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1920 x 1080 resolution and a better pixels count per inch in the screen. Moto G8 Power Lite counts with more storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto G8 Power Lite also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 256 GB.
Moto G8 Power Lite features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the Moto G8 Power Lite also counts with a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 3 takes slightly better pictures and videos than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking photographs or video in low-light environments and a camera in the back with less mega pixels, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution.
Moto G8 Power Lite features a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56% bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.