Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than the Moto G8 Power Lite, having an 81.2 score against 74.3. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version and Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy Note 3 construction is just a bit thinner and lighter than Moto G8 Power Lite, although it was released 7 years before.
Galaxy Note 3 has a lot better looking display than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a higher pixel number per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a processor that's just as good as the processing unit in Moto G8 Power Lite, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an inferior number of 2300 megahertz cores and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
Galaxy Note 3 features just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light photos and a worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition. The Moto G8 Power Lite has a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto G8 Power Lite also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 256 GB.
The Moto G8 Power Lite has a superior battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy Note 3 is also the cheapest, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.