Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-20 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite's global score of 74.3. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an noticeably older cellphone than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat lighter and thinner anyway.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a better looking screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater pixels density and a much better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to Moto G8 Power Lite's one, both of them have equal internal memory and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a processing unit that is just as good as Moto G8 Power Lite's CPU, both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Moto G8 Power Lite counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition captures clearer videos and photos than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture for better captures and video in low light environments.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.