Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-20 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is a bit better than Moto G8 Power Lite's general score of 74.3. Galaxy Note7's design is thinner and somewhat lighter than Moto G8 Power Lite, even though it was released many years before. Galaxy Note7 counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a way greater pixel density.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite and the Samsung Galaxy Note7 both feature quite similar storage for applications and games, both of them have an external memory card slot that holds up to 256 GB and the same internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite also has 4 more cores.
The Galaxy Note7 captures slightly better videos and photos than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less MP, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture for better low light images. The Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.