Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-20 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 is much better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, getting an 83 score against 74.3. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note8 is a lot older than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, it's design is just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner. Both of these phones come with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (operating system).
Samsung Galaxy Note8 has just a little better processing power than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note8 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note8 features a better looking display than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better screen pixels density and a lot higher 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 counts with a slightly better camera than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less mega pixels, it also counts with a larger aperture and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The Galaxy Note8 features as much memory to store more games and applications as Moto G8 Power Lite, both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 256 GB and equal 64 GB internal memory.
The Moto G8 Power Lite counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Note8, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note8 is way more expensive than the Moto G8 Power Lite, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.