Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-20 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is much better than Moto G8 Power Lite, with an 88.3 score against 74.3. Even though the Galaxy S10 is older than the Moto G8 Power Lite, it's construction is way lighter and somewhat thinner. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 has the older 11 version and Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features a way better looking screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher pixels quantity per display inch and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit better processor than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 captures better videos and photos than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a much larger camera aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S10 is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.