Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-20 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is way better than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite's 74.3 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an older 11 version and Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's body is just a bit lighter and thinner than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, although it was released just 11 months before.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a way higher screen density, a bit larger screen and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3040px. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features just a little better performance than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy S10 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a way larger diafragm aperture.
Moto G8 Power Lite has a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy S10 5G costs a bit more money than the Moto G8 Power Lite, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.