Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-20 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is better than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite's general score of 74.3. The Samsung Galaxy S10e is an older phone than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, but it is somewhat thinner and extremely lighter anyway. The Galaxy S10e has a sharper display than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2280.
Galaxy S10e counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10e also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a much better camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much bigger diafragm aperture and a way higher video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S10e is more expensive than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.