Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is much better than the Moto G8 Power Lite's 74.3 overall score. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 has an older 13 version while Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy S20 is a somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter phone than Moto G8 Power Lite, although they were released with only 1 months difference.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with an incredibly better display than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and much more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a superior camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a camera with a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography. The Galaxy S20 has a much better storage for games and applications than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Moto G8 Power Lite counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy S20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Galaxy S20 is way more expensive than Moto G8 Power Lite, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.