Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, getting a 90.8 score against 74.3. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 FE has the previous 11 version while Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though the Galaxy S20 FE and Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite were only released 6 months apart, the Galaxy S20 FE is just a little lighter and just a little thinner.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a brighter screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a better pixel count in each inch of screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S20 FE has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 FE shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a back camera with lot less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way higher video quality and a bigger camera aperture.
The Moto G8 Power Lite has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 FE costs a lot more money than Moto G8 Power Lite, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.