Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is way better than Moto G8 Power Lite's 74.3 general score. Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and the Moto G8 Power Lite were released with only 1 months difference, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is a little bit heavier but just a bit thinner than the Moto G8 Power Lite. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the previous 13 version and Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little faster processor than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a much greater count of pixels per inch in the screen, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a little bit bigger display.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot better camera than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a larger aperture to take better low light images and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery life is just as good as Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite's battery life.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way more expensive than the Moto G8 Power Lite, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.