Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is much better than Moto G8 Power Lite's general score of 74.3. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has an older 13 version while Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy S22's design is newer, thinner and lighter than Moto G8 Power Lite.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot greater pixel amount per inch of display.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has a slightly better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 256 GB. The Galaxy S22 captures way better pictures and videos than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a larger aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments, a camera with a much higher resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Moto G8 Power Lite counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 35% greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.