Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite's general score of 74.3. The Galaxy S22 Ultra body is newer and just a little bit thinner than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite's, although it's also heavier. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little bit better performance than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a quite larger display, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a much higher screen density.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has just a bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite and the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra feature incredibly similar battery durations.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a larger camera aperture, a much higher video definition and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.