Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Plus is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, having a overall score of 78.1 against 74.3. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S5 Plus has the older 4.4.2 version and Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy S5 Plus's design is extremely lighter and thinner than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, although it was released many years before.
The Galaxy S5 Plus has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a GPU. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus features a way better display than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher pixel count per inch of screen and a higher 1920 x 1080 resolution.
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 256 GB and 64 GB internal storage. Moto G8 Power Lite features a really longer battery life than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S5 Plus captures clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same resolution camera, the Galaxy S5 Plus also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.