Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport has a score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than the Moto G8 Power Lite's global score of 74.3. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S5 Sport has older 4.4.2 version and Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy S5 Sport is an a lot older phone than the Moto G8 Power Lite, but it is just a little thinner and way lighter anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a much sharper screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and much more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy S5 Sport features a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has lesser RAM and 4 lesser cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
The Galaxy S5 Sport captures clearer pictures and videos than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality. Moto G8 Power Lite features a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 256 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Moto G8 Power Lite has a way better battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport and the Moto G8 Power Lite cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.