Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-20 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is just a bit better than Moto G8 Power Lite, getting a overall score of 79.5 against 74.3. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy S7 is incredibly older than Moto G8 Power Lite, it's body is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner. Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite also has more cpu cores.
Galaxy S7 features a lot better looking screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a way better number of pixels per inch of display. Galaxy S7 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a camera with a much lower 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition and a bigger aperture.
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has much more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 67 percent greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S7 is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.