Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-20 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active is a little bit better than the Moto G8 Power Lite, with a global score of 75.8 against 74.3. Galaxy S7 Active is a way older and just a bit thicker cellphone than Moto G8 Power Lite, but Samsung was able to build it just a little lighter anyway. Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite also has a higher number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a way better looking screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a lot more pixels per display inch. The Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB and 32 GB more internal memory.
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has improved battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25 percent more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active shoots clearer photographs and videos than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in low light situations and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.