Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 270 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite's score of 74.3. Despite being the best we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro construction is a lot thicker and heavier than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has older 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior processor than Moto G8 Power Lite. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much sharper screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher number of pixels per screen inch and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite counts with a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 16 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a slightly bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Moto G8 Power Lite features a little better battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G8 Power Lite, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G8 Power Lite. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto G8 Power Lite, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.