Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, getting an 81 score against 74.3. Even though the Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, we must highlight that it's also a little heavier and just a little bit thicker. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has an older 11 version and Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a brighter screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater number of pixels per inch of display and a way higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's CPU is just as good as the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite one, both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G8 Power Lite counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4050mAh.
The Galaxy XCover Pro shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a lot higher 25 megapixels resolution camera and a larger camera aperture.
Galaxy XCover Pro is a lot more expensive than the Moto G8 Power Lite, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.