Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is much better than the Moto G8 Power Lite's 74.3 overall score. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is just a bit lighter and thinner than the Moto G8 Power Lite, even when both of them were only released with a couple months difference. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version while Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy Z Flip features a better screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a little larger display, a lot better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a much higher display pixels density. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a superior camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality.
The Moto G8 Power Lite has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52% bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.