Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 299.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, having a overall score of 92.3 against 74.3. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version and Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is way thinner and a little lighter than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, although they were only released with a couple months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a sharper display than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a way better count of pixels per screen inch and a bit larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much better camera than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a lot less megapixels camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality and a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photography.
Moto G8 Power Lite counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.