Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is way better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite's general score of 74.3. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite were released only a few months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is much heavier but also way thinner. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a better looking display than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a higher pixels count in each inch of display, a bigger display and a lot better resolution of 1768 x 2208px.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light situations and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Moto G8 Power Lite features a little better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.