Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia Z4v is a bit better than the Moto G8 Power Lite, having a 78.8 score against 74.3. Although the Sony Xperia Z4v is much older than Moto G8 Power Lite, it's design is a bit thinner and lighter. These devices include Android OS, but Sony Xperia Z4v has the previous 5.1 version and Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie.
Sony Xperia Z4v features a little better processing power than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Sony Xperia Z4v counts with an incredibly better screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a way greater screen pixels density.
The Moto G8 Power Lite has much more storage for games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because it has more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 256 GB. Sony Xperia Z4v takes much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Sony Xperia Z4v also has a back facing camera with much more MP and a way better video quality.
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has a much longer battery duration than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Sony Xperia Z4v is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.