Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is a bit better than Moto G8 Power, having a global score of 80.2 against 76. Although the Google Pixel is incredibly older than Moto G8 Power, it's design is thinner and extremely lighter. The Motorola Moto G8 Power has a little faster processor than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola Moto G8 Power also has a larger number of cores.
Google Pixel has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a really smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a bit better count of pixels per screen inch. Motorola Moto G8 Power has a greater memory for applications and games than Google Pixel, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G8 Power takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Moto G8 Power also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and a back facing camera with a lot better 16 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto G8 Power features a superior battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Google Pixel costs more than the Moto G8 Power, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.