Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is just a bit better than the Moto G8 Power, getting a general score of 80 against 76. The Google Pixel 3 is an older cellphone than the Moto G8 Power, but it is thinner and notably lighter anyway. Google Pixel 3 features a slightly better screen than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher display density.
The Google Pixel 3 features a bit more powerful processor than Moto G8 Power. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores. Moto G8 Power has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G8 Power also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera and a bigger aperture to take better low light images.
Moto G8 Power has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto G8 Power also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G8 Power has a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3 not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.