Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is a little bit better than the Moto G8 Power, getting a 78.8 score against 76. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a has a newer 11 version and Moto G8 Power has Android 10 version. Although Google Pixel 3a is older than Moto G8 Power, it's construction is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner.
Motorola Moto G8 Power and Google Pixel 3a both count with extremely similar processors, both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Google Pixel 3a counts with just a bit better display than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2220 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola Moto G8 Power features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto G8 Power also counts with a camera with much more mega-pixels and a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
Moto G8 Power has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G8 Power also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Moto G8 Power features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Google Pixel 3a is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.