Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than the Moto G8 Power's global score of 76. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 3a XL is older than Moto G8 Power, it's design is thinner and somewhat lighter. These phones use Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a XL has newer 11 version while Moto G8 Power has Android 10 version.
The Google Pixel 3a XL and Moto G8 Power feature extremely similar processors, they have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount. Google Pixel 3a XL features a screen that's just as good as Motorola Moto G8 Power's screen, because although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel density.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power captures slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola Moto G8 Power also counts with a way more mega pixels back camera and a larger camera aperture to take better images in low light environments.
Motorola Moto G8 Power features a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G8 Power also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G8 Power features longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Google Pixel 3a XL is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.