Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, getting a general score of 82.9 against 76. Although the Google Pixel 4 XL and the Motorola Moto G8 Power were only released with a couple of months difference, the Google Pixel 4 XL is a little lighter and somewhat thinner. Google Pixel 4 XL features just a bit better screen than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel number per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has more RAM memory. The Moto G8 Power shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G8 Power also counts with a camera with a much better 16 MP resolution.
Moto G8 Power counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Moto G8 Power also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G8 Power features improved battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G8 Power. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto G8 Power, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.