Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Just black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power's 76 overall score. The Google Pixel 4a design is incredibly lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, even though they were released with only 4 months difference. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a has 11 version and Motorola Moto G8 Power has Android 10, so it provides you some additional features and optimized performance.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a little faster CPU than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4a also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a has just a bit better looking display than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little higher pixels count in each inch of display.
Moto G8 Power captures clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same video resolution, the Moto G8 Power also counts with a camera with way more MP.
The Moto G8 Power has a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The Moto G8 Power counts with a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a is way more expensive than Moto G8 Power, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.