Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power's global score of 76. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has newer 11 version while Motorola Moto G8 Power has Android 10, so it gives you a lot of extra features. The Google Pixel 4a 5G body is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, although they were released with only 7 months difference.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has just a bit better looking display than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better display density and a bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with a better storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit superior processor than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. The Motorola Moto G8 Power has better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 29% more battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a slightly better camera than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower 12.2 megapixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, and they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality photos and videos.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.