Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is much better than the Moto G8 Power, getting an 89 score against 76. Even though the Google Pixel 5 and the Moto G8 Power were only released 6 months apart, the Google Pixel 5 is thinner and notably lighter. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 5 has just a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixels density and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with a better memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Google Pixel 5 has a bit better camera than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a way worse 12.2 MP resolution back-facing camera and a worse video quality, and they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures.
The Moto G8 Power features superior battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23% more battery size.
The Google Pixel 5 is a lot more expensive than Moto G8 Power, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.