Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 397 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G8 Power, having a score of 77 against 76. HTC U Ultra's design is lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, although it was released 3 years before. HTC U Ultra counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch of display.
HTC U Ultra counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola Moto G8 Power also has more CPU cores.
Motorola Moto G8 Power has a slightly better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing lower quality photographs and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G8 Power also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better 16 MP resolution and a larger aperture.
The Moto G8 Power has a very superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G8 Power. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the HTC U Ultra, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G8 Power, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.