Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Moto G8 Power, with a global score of 87.1 against 76. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra design has the same weight than Moto G8 Power, but it's thinner. These devices work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Moto G8 Power has Android 10.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much sharper screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Moto G8 Power features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Moto G8 Power features a little better battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures way better photographs and videos than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better images in low light situations, faster video frame rates, a lot larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos and a way better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.