Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 237.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is just a bit better than Moto G8 Power, getting a 79.9 score against 76. These phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has newer 14 version and Moto G8 Power has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a somewhat thinner phone than Moto G8 Power, but both of them weight the same.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a little worse pixel number per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a very superior storage for applications and games than Moto G8 Power, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Motorola Moto G8 Power has a way better performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much better camera than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Galaxy A25 5G has a battery life that's just as good as the battery life in Moto G8 Power.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.