Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is much better than Motorola Moto G8 Power's score of 76. Samsung Galaxy A50 is an older cellphone than Motorola Moto G8 Power, but it's somewhat lighter and noticeably thinner anyway. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto G8 Power. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit greater pixels amount per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy A50 captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a lot more MP camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has much more memory for applications and games than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has 64 GB more internal storage. Moto G8 Power has improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy A50 is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.