Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is better than Moto G8 Power's 76 score. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 operating system, so they should offer the same operating system features. Samsung Galaxy A50s is a somewhat lighter and much thinner device than the Moto G8 Power, even when they were only released 6 months apart.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a little better display pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340. Galaxy A50s counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A50s also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A50s captures much better pictures and videos than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Moto G8 Power counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.