Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is much better than the Moto G8 Power's 76 score. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A51 has newer 11 version and Moto G8 Power has Android 10 version. Although Samsung Galaxy A51 and Moto G8 Power were only released with a couple of months difference, Samsung Galaxy A51 is lighter and thinner.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a little sharper display than Moto G8 Power, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a quite bigger display and a little bit more pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A51 counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G8 Power. They have a 4 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores. Galaxy A51 takes better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution and a much bigger sensor shooting much better quality photos and videos.
Moto G8 Power has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is more expensive than Motorola Moto G8 Power, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.