Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is better than the Moto G8 Power's overall score of 76. The Galaxy A51 5G construction is somewhat thinner and a little lighter than Moto G8 Power, although they were only released with a few months difference. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 5G has the newer 11 version while Moto G8 Power has Android 10.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a bit better looking screen than Moto G8 Power, because it has a little bit bigger display, a little more pixels per screen inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a better camera than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera and a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality.
Motorola Moto G8 Power features just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy A51 5G is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.