Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 237.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is better than the Moto G8 Power, with a 90.7 score against 76. The Samsung Galaxy A52 design is newer, just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G8 Power. The Galaxy A52 counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A52 also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because it has a bit larger screen, a little higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a bit higher count of pixels in each screen inch. The Galaxy A52 features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G8 Power, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Moto G8 Power features a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size. Galaxy A52 shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing images in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.