Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is way better than Moto G8 Power, getting a general score of 91.3 against 76. Galaxy A52 5G is a newer device, and it's also a little lighter and thinner than Moto G8 Power. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version and Moto G8 Power has Android 10, giving you some extra features.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a little bit better looking screen than Moto G8 Power, because it has a little bit bigger display, a just a bit higher screen density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G8 Power, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy A52 5G captures way better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking images in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back camera with a much better 64 MP resolution and a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Moto G8 Power counts with a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.