Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 237.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is better than Moto G8 Power, getting a 91.1 score against 76. Galaxy A52s's body is newer, thinner and a little bit lighter than Moto G8 Power. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52s has a more recent 11 version while Moto G8 Power has Android 10 version, providing you some nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because it has a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit larger screen and a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a bit better processing power than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A52s captures a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos and a way more mega pixels back camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G8 Power, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Moto G8 Power features just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.