Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| $ 237.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 is better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, getting a overall score of 85.2 against 76. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy F41 has 11 version while Motorola Moto G8 Power has Android 10, giving you lots of additional features and performance tweaks. Even when Samsung Galaxy F41 and the Motorola Moto G8 Power were released with only a couple months difference, Samsung Galaxy F41 is a little lighter and a little thinner.
Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a little better performance than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy F41 features just a bit better looking display than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy F41 captures much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a way bigger sensor taking lot better quality photos and videos.
Motorola Moto G8 Power and Galaxy F41 both feature very similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB and equal internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F41 features better battery lifetime than Moto G8 Power, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.