Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| $ 237.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than Moto G8 Power's 76 general score. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but Galaxy F62 has newer 11 version while Moto G8 Power has Android 10 version. Galaxy F62 is a newer and just a little thinner phone than Moto G8 Power, although it's also a bit heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with more RAM. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a slightly better looking screen than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a bit lower pixel quantity in each inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy F62 features a superior camera than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing images and video in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera in the back and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G8 Power, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy F62 features a superior battery performance than Moto G8 Power, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.