Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| $ 237.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is much better than the Moto G8 Power, getting a global score of 97.6 against 76. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Moto G8 Power has Android 10, so it offers a couple nice extra features. The Galaxy Fold design is incredibly heavier but a lot thinner than Moto G8 Power, and both were only released 7 months apart.
Galaxy Fold has a bit superior processing unit than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. Galaxy Fold counts with a display that's very similar to the display in Moto G8 Power, because although the Galaxy Fold has a quite inferior number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1536 x 2152 pixels and a little bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has just a bit better camera than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a lot lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lower video definition, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor and a larger camera aperture. Samsung Galaxy Fold has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G8 Power, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto G8 Power has just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G8 Power. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G8 Power, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.