Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, having an 81.2 score against 76. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is an way older device than Motorola Moto G8 Power, but it's lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version and Motorola Moto G8 Power has Android 10 version.
Galaxy Note 3 has a little faster processor than Moto G8 Power, because although it has 4 less cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Galaxy Note 3 has a brighter display than Moto G8 Power, although it has a just a bit lower display density, a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little smaller display.
Moto G8 Power counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G8 Power also has a bigger camera sensor taking higher quality photographs and videos, a higher 16 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a much larger camera aperture.
Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G8 Power also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G8 Power features a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 3 costs a bit more than the Moto G8 Power, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.